Abstract
In this paper we analyze the anaphoric pronoun relativization strategy in medieval Castilian texts, with the objective of determining the advantages that explain why the speaker occasionally prefers this choice of relativization. The result of our study is that the functionality of this constructionis due to pragmatic and discoursive reasons, since it is adequate to perceive clearly relevant entities which require more effort for their processing. Moreover, it is more flexible than the strategy of the relative pronoun for the pragmatic and informative treatment of entities according to the speaker’s preferences.Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica (1947-), volume 66, 2, July-December 2018, is a semi-annual publication edited by El Colegio de México, Carretera Picacho Ajusco 20, Ampliación Fuentes del Pedregal, Tlalpan, C.P. 14110, Mexico City, Mexico, Tel. (55) 5449-3000, http://nrfh.colmex.mx/index.php/NRFH, nrfh@colmex.mx. Editor: Pedro Martín Butragueño. Assistant editors: Alejandro Rivas and Jesus Jorge Valenzuela. All Rights Reserved: 04-2015-070112341900-203, ISSN (print): 0185-0121, ISSN (electronic): 2448-6558, as registered with the National Copyright Institute. Typographical composition: El Atril Tipográfico. Person in charge of updating this issue: Perla Reyna Muñoz; date of last update: June 26, 2018.
The content of the articles published is the responsibility of the author, and does not represent the point of view of Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica. The partial or total reproduction of the contents or images of the publication is authorized, including electronic storage, provided it is strictly for academic purposes and not for profit, and that the source is cited without altering the content, and authorial credits are given.